Showing posts with label NASCAR Changes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NASCAR Changes. Show all posts

Friday, February 12, 2016

Catching up on the 2016 NASCAR Changes

A Quick Review of the Offseason Moves and Changes


By Richard Tix

Another NASCAR offseason has come and gone and just like any other year, it is hard to keep track of all the moves and changes. It always takes a few races for fans to adjust to driver's in new cars and with new teams, so this year NASCAR Behind the Wall is here to help. 


Driver Moves
  • #7 Regan Smith in the #7 (Alex Bowman no Cup ride in 2016)
  • #14 Brian Vickers to run Daytona 500 for Tony Stewart. Ty Dillon to also run select races in the #14
  • #15 Clint Bowyer moved to HScott Motorsports. Changed from #51 to #15. (Justin Allgaier no Cup ride in 2016)
  • #21 Ryan Blaney to run full time in the #21 Wood Brothers ride.
  • #23 David Ragan joins BK Racing in the #23
  • #24 Chase Elliott takes over for the retired Jeff Gordon (Chase was in the 25 for select races in 2015)
  • #34 Rookie Chris Buescher takes over the 34 at FRM
  • #38 Landon Cassill moves from the #40 of Hillman to #38 at FRM
  • #40 Reed Sorenson will be in the 40 for the Daytona 500. 
  • #44 The #9 was changed to the #44 and Hornish Jr was replaced by Brian Scott for 2016 (more on the #44 in NASCAR here)
  • #95 Ty Dillon will run 5 races in the #95 (including the Daytona 500). Michael McDowell will run the remaining schedule. He will be in the #59 for the 500.
  • #98 Cole Whitt will run the #98 for Premium Motorsports

Rules and News
  • NASCAR implements Charter System (more following this link)
    • 36 cars get a Charter. All 36 are guaranteed a spot in each race.
    • 9 year deal
    • Field cut from 43 cars to 40
    • Four open spots go to fastest non Charter teams in qualifying
    • Only way to get a Charter is to buy one from an existing team
  • NASCAR Overtime Line (more following this link)
    • Line at each track. After G-W-C flies, leader must cross this line before a real "clean start" is achieved.
    • Once a clean start is reached they finish the race, or a yellow brings the race to a finish and the field freezes as it was at the yellow. 
    • NASCAR will attempt as many restarts as it takes to get a "clean start."
  • Points Adjustment (more following this link)
    • First place now gets 40 points, second 39, and so on down the finishing order.
    • Bonus points are still added to finish position points like in the past
  • Caution Clock in the Truck Series
    • If they series runs green for 20 min a competition caution will fly
  • New Chase format brought to the Xfinity and Truck Series
  • Plenty of sponsor changes for teams and drivers. (find out more about this changes here)
  • New 2016 NASCAR Paint Scheme's have been released and will continue to come out. (2016 NASCAR Paint Scheme Page)
  • NASCAR Rookie of the Year Race
  • Tony Stewart's last full time season

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

NASCAR Implements Charter System for Upcoming Season

A Closer Look at the Charter System in NASCAR Cup


By Richard Tix

With much anticipation, NASCAR released the details of a new Charter System that will be implemented at the start of the 2016 season that is right around the corner (2016 Speedweek Schedule). For some time now it had been rumored that such a system might be coming, but after NASCAR announced on social media it had a large news announcement set for 2/9/16, it became a reality.

The rumors started a huge fan following on social media that started with "this is a stupid idea," to, "I will no longer go to a race because only 40 cars will be on the track." In short terms, it went from ridiculous to preposterous quickly. Most of this was coming from fans that knew nothing about the possible changes because details had yet to be released, yet were outraged.

In fact, all of the information was just "rumored" at the time (though some of it true), so no one really knew the full details on something they were so upset about.

In the end, the Charter system is a business decision made by NASCAR, its drivers, and its owners for the future of the sport to try and help facilitate an easier to forecast business model. Not only do they hope this helps the visibility of NASCAR teams and their costs, but also outside investors in the sport.

With more visibility NASCAR may become a smart business decision instead of a risky one, which may help lure some new sponsors and owners in. No longer will teams and sponsors have to worry about being in a race every week, or just that one week they have there name on the car. They can actually formulate a business plan that has at least some structure (every business plan has outside events that could happen, but as NASCAR is right now they're too many of them for it to be a smart business move).

If someone wants to get into a guaranteed spot then the market will dictate the price and they can get in by purchasing a Charter. No, it won't be cheap, but that also means that if a team is willing to spend that money they're also willing to spend it on the track and must have investors lined up. It also gives a team that is struggling financially the ability to get out with at least some sort of reimbursement by selling there Charter, instead of selling cars for a nickle and a dime. Lets get into some of the released details and what it means.


Charter Details
  • 36 Charter spots. A Charter spot guarantees you into each week's race.
  • Must have run every race since 2013 to get a Charter (41 and 19 will have to purchase one)
  • Field is now 40 cars (down from 43)
  • The final four spots will be determined by qualifying.
  • Minimum nine year deal
  • Charters can be transferred: or bought
  • Agreement also includes the establishment of the Team Owner Council
Owned Charters
  • Henrdick Motorsports (4)
  • Team Penske (2)
  • Richard Petty Motorsports (2)
  • Richard Childress Racing (3)
  • Roush Fenway Racing (3)
  • Chip Ganassi Racing (2)
  • Joe Gibbs Racing (3) - The 19 does not have one (will buy from MWR)
  • Michael Waltrip Racing (2) - Will sell both (19 and 41)
  • Stewart-Haas Racing (3) - The 41 does not have one (will buy from MWR)
  • Furniture Row Racing (1)
  • Front Row Racing (2)
  • BK Racing (2)
  • JTG Daugherty Racing (1)
  • Tommy Baldwin Racing (1)
  • Germain Racing (1)
  • Go FAS Racing (1)
  • Premium Motorsports (1)
  • Circle Sport Racing (1)
  • HScott Motorsports (1) - Going to lease from Premium for the #46 of Annett

What it all Means?

The biggest thing is how NASCAR teams or future teams enter the sport. It won't be as easy to enter the sport, but if they do they will be serious and most likely have the funds to run weekly. This Charter system lets potential investors and owners see what they might get back weekly with more clarity. With it, teams can see the bare minimum that they should bring in each year and have a more predicable financial model from year to year which they can use to grow or sell out of a spot depending on their outlook.

It also assures sponsor's that if they put a name or brand on a car, that it will race that week no matter what happens. The smaller teams can effectively sell there product (car) to potential sponsors and tell they they will be in the race each week.

I also mentioned above that it will also help out teams that have a Charter that might be struggling to leave the sport with a bit of some financial help (selling Charter). The way of looking at race teams is changing, but not all of that maybe bad. However, most of the product on the track should be the same for the most part. The new business environment should provide a more stable and appealing market for sponsors, owners, and investors. If all goes well this could be a big move for NASCAR, but as always the real part of all of this will be in the details and how it actually plays out. It will be another wait and see game in a world of it that we have come to know in NASCAR. 

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

NASCAR's New 2015 Rules Package

Reduced HP and No Testing Headlining


By Richard Tix

On Tuesday NASCAR released its plans for changes in 2015. Per the usual in the NASCAR community, change hit hard and caused a social media frenzy with all kinds of opinions. I am going to reserve most of my judgement until I see the actual product with my own eyes. However, I do want to touch on some of the changes and provide fans with a place to get to all the links and stories quickly.


Testing:

"After allowing teams four tests at sanctioned tracks and unlimited private testing this year, NASCAR will ban teams from testing at any tracks following the season finale at Homestead-Miami Speedway. The preseason testing sessions at Daytona International Speedway have been eliminated." - USA Today

This seems like a plea by NASCAR to cut cost's, yet it seems like they are forgetting that it will still cost small teams a ton to get into areo facilities and have the staff now to keep pace with the big teams. This is just my assumption, though. 

"Any organization violating NASCAR's revised policy on testing would be subject to the highest tier of penalties, including a minimum $150,000 fine, the loss of 150 points and six-race suspensions for key personnel (crew chief, car chief, and team manager)." -SB Nation

So, heaver fines will be the biggest deterrent to not following this rule, which ties in the new penalty system from this past year. Team's may not be able to privately test but there will be more Goodyear testing that team's will partake in:

"Teams are still permitted to participate in NASCAR- and Goodyear-approved tests."
"If we can have NASCAR, Goodyear and the race teams all together, it'll be a home run. The second part is anytime you can minimize costs, that's big. We think we've done both." -USA Today

Horse Power Reduction:

"NASCAR is also reducing engine horsepower through a tapered spacer from 850 to 725, and cutting the rear spoiler from 8 inches high to 6 inches. Changes will take about 300 pounds of downforce off of the car."- FOX News

The real key here could be will it have the same affect it did on the Nationwide Series? Nationwide adopted the tapered spacer this past season and some fans have had a negative response to the change. It might be possible for the tapered spacer to not have as big of an effect on the Cup cars with all the other aero changes that are being made. In my mind this is the biggest concern. Maybe all the changes put together will work well, as I said I am reserving full judgement until I see it on the track.

"We believe what will contribute to better racing is the ability to get off the gas in the corners," O'Donnell said. "If you're able to slow down the straightaway speeds a bit, but really affect the speeds in the corners, where drivers have to make decisions on how much they want to get off the throttle, it allows for more passing in the turns, and it allows for tire manufacturer to really march toward a grippier tire. That will contribute to even better racing.

"Drivers said as the racing exists today, when they go in the corners, it's very rare to make a mistake. The car handles almost too well. This gives us an opportunity to force some mistakes and to pick different lanes. We think it'll add more dynamics in each corner, particularly on intermediate tracks."- USA Today

The thing I do think NASCAR did very well with (and wont reserve judgement) is the fact that they took a lot of driver input into consideration. This time around, if the changes fail it was a full effort by everyone involved (drivers, teams, officials, engineers, etc). Hopefully it doesn't completely fail (COT) and NASCAR gets even better racing. 

"It was like going back 15 years in time knowing you could actually pass in the corners instead of worrying about drafting in the straightaway," Matt Kenseth said. "You could get one guy on the bottom and one guy on the top, the air wasn't so turbulent that you couldn't get outside of people so the track got really wide. It was like the track aged 10 years and it was awesome. Everybody got out with a smile on their face." -SB Nation

I think the real issue NASCAR was having was the huge complaint of the "dirty air." So NASCAR took to all the complaints from fans and drivers (even when fans say NASCAR never listens) and tried to make the Gen 6 car better. It seems drivers (at least Kenseth) was impressed with the car overall in traffic. 

O'Donnell said the goal is more green-flag passes for the lead and "we believe that will happen with drivers potentially making errors in the corner, and that's not just for the lead, but the entire field." -FOX News

Overall I my initial reaction is that NASCAR is trying to improve the quality of racing. Will this do it? Wait and see. But its nice to see them trying to tackle the largest issue (dirty air) while getting input from its best source, the drivers.

More Changes:

"Other changes announced Tuesday are that NASCAR will also now use rain tires in the Sprint Cup Series at Sonoma and Watkins Glen. The rain tires are already used in the lower Nationwide and Truck Series races on road courses, to positive fan feedback." -FOX News

New rain tires will be brought out at the road courses in 2015. I think it will only add to the excitement that we have had in the past few years at these tracks. I just hope Ambrose will be brought back as a ringer for someone!

"The option for a cockpit-controlled panhard bar to allow drivers to alter handling with a suspension adjustment that currently is made by crew members with a wrench during pit stops." -USA Today

This could also help drivers with the "dirty air" problem, since they will be able to change during a run. 

"A new video analytics system for officiating the pits (judging whether cars enter the box correctly and lug nuts properly are tightened on tires), which is being tested during the Chase for the Sprint Cup. The 2015 system will rely on enhanced cameras and software that will be analyzed by eight officials in a high-tech trailer. A half-dozen officials still will roam the pits for communication with teams." -USA Today

Will a half-dozen officials be enough to police all of these new changes going on in NASCAR? Seems like NASCAR is heading the way of technology and forgetting the human element NASCAR teams might need on hand.

"As for qualifying, the formats will be shortened at all types of tracks, mostly to cut the length of time in the first segment. Teams currently are sitting on pit road trying to time when to run a hot lap, and NASCAR will try to eliminate the waiting.

The first segment on short tracks and intermediate tracks will be 15 minutes, followed by a break, then 10 minutes, a break, and a final 5-minute session. At superspeedways, the field will be divided into two groups for the first 5-minute session, followed by two more 5-minute sessions.

Road course qualifying will consist of one 25-minute session, followed by a 10-minute session.

The Daytona 500 front row qualifying will be done in groups, but the length of the breaks is still being tweaked as NASCAR needs to fill a 3-hour television window" -FOX News

NASCAR just seems to be streamlining the new qualifying format they brought into Cup this season.



As I mentioned above, I will reserve most judgment until we see the actual product. I have liked the steps NASCAR has taken as a whole (a few things here and there I think could be tweaked). I think the fact that they're trying to at least dive into the "dirty air" vs "clean air" dilemma is a step in the right direction. Will it work? That will be seen in 2015. Its still 2014 so lets enjoy the 2014 Sprint Cup Chase.

2015 NASCAR Rule Links:

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

How Can NASCAR Fix it's Biggest Problems?

NASCAR's Big Changes Before it is too Late


By Richard Tix

I will start out with this statement. This is not the first "NASCAR has a problem and needs to fix it," article nor will it be the last.  That's because in some sense NASCAR does have a problem it needs to resolve.  Everyone has heard hundreds of times by now that NASCAR has an attendance problem.

In recent years less and less fans have been going to see races. When NASCAR hit it's boom they did not think ahead to the day when things even out. NASCAR just went for the jugular and expanded aggressively. They left the southern roots behind for a more general demographic.

NASCAR needed to, at that time, move to more areas in the country. Many fans across the nation were hooked on NASCAR. At that same time NASCAR forgot what was working. Southern tracks had a more home town feel, and a lot of this was because NASCAR had a lot of good short-intermediate tracks on the schedule.

Well, when NASCAR expanded it was mostly 1.5 mile tracks that many fans call "cookie-cutter" tracks. I do enjoy most of these tracks, but what NASCAR was thinking with these 1.5 mile tracks was more seats, better views, more money. They thought more seats was good for the fans as well as themselves ($$$), but they were living in the moment and not thinking about the day it could catch up to them.

The day has come where this grand expansion has caught up with NASCAR. This happen's in every major sport that we know. It is how NASCAR handles it from here on out that will decide the sports future and how its fan base take it.  NASCAR is not yet too deep to dig itself back out. Let's be honest, NASCAR still brings in far more fans in a single weekend race then any other US sporting event. Just because we saw how big it was doesn't mean all the less fans we see in the stands every weekend wasn't going to happen anyways.

But NASCAR has to start considering some changes before it is too late. A race weekend becomes too expensive to go to for the normal fan. When these fans have a family that also loves the same sport as them it becomes almost impossible to go to the track on Sunday (Saturday night). These same fans would much rather visit there local small town track for a much more reasonable price, plus its arguable that the action is just as good on a given night.

So what should NASCAR do? This is the part where everyone has there grand idea that will be a sure fire fix. Most don't realize it won't be that easy. I mean heck, the NASCAR fan base didn't take a Chase points system change with a grain of salt. The changes will have to be a wait and see change and as we know, NASCAR fans get upset over that. First reaction is, "Mr France is ruining this sport." "This sport has gone down hill starting with Dale Earnhardt's death." The reactions go on and on without giving NASCAR a chance.

So, it has to start out with us fans admitting things need a change and we have to actually accept change. Next, something has to happen to the schedule. I am all in favor of adding more short tracks, road courses, and tracks with character.

New Tracks (Short and Unique)

Iowa Speedway in my mind would be a great addition, which many drivers have also said. This is just one of many ideas. Short tracks would allow NASCAR to fill the smaller stands while still giving the fans great on track racing with some bumping and banging. When NASCAR heads to a 1.5 mile track the smallest nudge can ruin both drivers day. Racing started with bumping and banging and short tracks give these drivers that opportunity without ending there day because of a dent ruining the "aero."

When adding in the short tracks, take some 1.5 mile tracks out of the schedule who get two stops. Even a track like Michigan International Speedway (which I really do enjoy and go to every year) could be reduced to one stop a season. Texas, Kansas, and Pocono all also come to mind. Same with Dover (not a 1.5) if they don't figure out attendance issues of there own.

Some of these smaller or unique tracks can start there own history. How Darlington lost a second race on the schedule after a storied history is beyond me. NASCAR needs to bring the character back to the tracks. Even when a 1.5 mile track has some weird bumps that actually provide great racing rumors pop up that they are going to repave it.

More small tracks, less two stop 1.5 mile track (or larger tracks like MIS and Pocono), and add a road course or two (including in the Chase). Road courses don't exactly provide the best views and sight lines, but they do create a lot of great on track racing (beating and banging). Adding one to the Chase would only amplify the excitement on the track and hopefully some fans in the stands.

Race Length:

Past my scheduling ideas NASCAR needs to take a look at race lengths. This has been talked about a lot and every angle has been looked at. I am in favor of changing some of the race lengths. Some fuel mileage races a shorter race would be beneficial. I don't want to touch some of the traditional races, like the 600 or the Daytona 500, but some events can be shortened to provide more excitement. As much as I love scheduling my Sunday around a 4 hour race, fans attention spans are becoming shorter. Not only that but the longer the race, the better chance we have of a drawn out fuel mileage finish.

Weekend Expense's:

One more thing that NASCAR really needs to take into account is the expense of a race weekend. The big issue isn't the ticket price (in general a good seat to a Cup race ins't far off from say a good ticket to a NBA
or NFL game) but rather the rest of the expenses. NASCAR has a very unique dilemma when it comes to fans attending its events. Unlike most other sports where I would say 70-80% come from the nearby area (this is just a simple guess), NASCAR brings in fans from surrounding states. I know at the Michigan race I go to fans from touching states plus Minnesota, Iowa, and Canada all attend. This is the norm when it comes to track attendance.

Nearby hotels are on to this and will jack up prices for the weekend. I am lucky as we have friends that live 45 min from MIS in Brooklyn MI, but many are not so lucky. What NASCAR really needs to look into is a package deal. In a sport that is known for its sponsors and sponsor relations why can't they look into partnering with airlines or hotels in the area to help out the budget conscience fan? Package a deal that is a two night stay with tickets to qualifying and the race. Sort of an all inclusive deal but for a race weekend.

Chase Scheduling

I am also a believer that the Chase races needs some rearranging. I know it isn't going to happen now that Ford and Holmstead inked a new deal, but I think at the very least the last Chase race needs to rotate between a few tracks (ones that would work during that time of the season weather wise). If the last race is going to mean so much (top finisher of the final four wins the title) then the venue needs to change so that drivers who are strong at Miami do not always have the obvious advantage.

If NASCAR did change more then just race #10 I would start by tweaking the last 9 (including taking a few tracks out and adding a few, like a road course and maybe adding Bristol, Richmond, or both). I think each segment should be set in there three race group as to keep something in the schedule constant.

Example:

Segment 1

  1. Loudon- Always stays first segment
  2. Bristol- Always stays first segment
  3. Sonoma- Can move between segment's if needed for scheduling conflicts because its in CA.
Segment 2
  • Segment 2 can switch with segment 3 and vice versa. 
  1. Texas- Warm enough to be the last race.
  2. Charlotte
  3. Martinsville
Segment 3
  1. Richmond
  2. Talladega
  3. Phoenix
Championship
  1. Miami- Phoenix, Texas, Talladega, Martinsville (might be too cold, 60's), and Richmond (also probably too cold for November) could all be interchanged. Really, I just want at least two tracks to switch with, so Texas and Phoenix would work.
So, explaining this a bit. Segment one would always stay there (except Sonoma can move being in CA) because NH and Bristol, CT will just be too cold to move around to later dates. Segment #2 and #3 can swap spots. So in 2015 segment 2 can come first and then in 2016 segment 3 can come first. Within each segment Miami can be exchanged out for Texas or Phoenix (or any track deemed ok to run that late in the season). 

I would like to keep some consistency from year to year for fans to know about what the schedule will be. Many fans like to schedule these trips to the tracks annually, so knowing the track they go to will be a part of the same segment every year helps. Also, for the most part other then the Championship race, the race will only have one of two days (depending on if the segment comes second or third during the Chase (segment one doesn't move). 

One thing I couldn't work in would be adding Fontana or Las Vegas into the Chase. Both could also be good decent weather tracks for the Championship. I would be open to the idea of even moving out Miami in a given year to the beginning of the season and replacing it with either track. I do like both at the start of the season because they have helped 2013 and 2014 get off to hot starts. "If it's not broke, don't fix it." But, in the future this could be a possibility easy to swap. As we know, in this day in age NASCAR will make a change whenever they feel like it.

Obviously, after looking at the way I would possibly set up the Chase schedule, I am ok with keeping NASCAR new rules. I do like the new rules in general (except for the last race always being Miami), but I also know NASCAR isn't ready to explode there newest idea (so why mess with it).

I think after moving Richmond into the Chase and Dover out, that Dover could be a big draw as the last race of the regular season. Yes, Jimmie Johnson wins a lot there, but he will start to fade eventually. Plus, Dover would gain some attendance with its new spotlight and it (in my mind) is an exciting track. At the same time, if there attendance stays down later this year for the Chase race, I would also pull one of the stops at Dover in this new schedule off (making Dover another track with one stop and possibly adding another new short track).



Fan's "ways to fix NASCAR" ideas are endless. What will actually fix NASCAR has yet to be seen, but I don't really think it needs to be fixed as much as tweaked to fine tune the system. Sometimes we as humans are exposed to something that is too good to be true (that was NASCAR's hay day). We start to think too much about, "man those were the good ole days," and then it is too late to realize we could have made things better in the present. Getting back to the roots of more short track racing where cars can trade paint and still stay competitive, making a weekend trip a bit more inexpensive, and changing the Chase schedule are just a few of my ideas to get the ball rolling back in the right direction. Then one day we can think, man those were the days when we changed NASCAR for the better forever.

So what are your ideas? Let me know on Twitter or Google +. Do you like these ideas? Do you think they would help? What else needs a change? 

Thursday, April 10, 2014

The Fight for Points

NASCAR's New Points Rule Change


By Richard Tix

To start the 2014 season NASCAR made some huge announcements which brought out mixed reactions from drivers, media, and the fan base. Among these dramatic changes was a new way NASCAR would hold there points standings for getting into the Sprint Cup Chase (NASCAR's New Era).

The new rules were to create a bigger emphasis on winning week to week and so far we as fans have seemed to benefit from that. But, has it really been because of the new rules? Are guys who don't have a win using a different strategy to win?

I would argue no. Guys are still trying to win week to week just like they always have. As normal, the guys back in 12th spot are still just trying to get a quality finish and move onto the next week -so nothing really changed there. I will agree though, that guys who already have a win in 2014 can gamble and use different strategies, which in turn may open up the door for a different winner when the gamble doesn't pay off (example:Dale Jr, Las Vegas when he ran out of gas and Brad Keselowski won).

As I stated before the season starts in the article NASCAR's New Era, I like the new system and I still hold to that. But I do believe some people are completely throwing out the idea that points matter and now its all about winning.

Winning means more in 2014 than it did in 2013, NASCAR definitely hit the nail on the head on that, but at the end of the regular 26 race season (before the Chase) I do not think we will have 16 winners. Even if we do, the way it shapes up right now Jeff Gordon would still get in. The top spot in the points standings at the end of 26 races gets into the Chase with a win or without.  That means even if you believe we have 16 winners, one would miss out if the top driver in the standings doesn't have a win.

If you are adding it up, that would mean the remaining 15 spots would come down to, you guessed it, points. Only 15 of the 16 winners would get a Chase spot and this would all be decided by who has the most points. Once again, wins matter most, because a guy with 2 or 3 wins gets in before the guy with 1 win, but all the guys with one win would be fighting in points for a spot.

Now, lets take the other angle, the angle I think will happen. Lets say at race 24 of 26 NASCAR has 12 winners (or 13, 14, anything short of 16). That will leave 3 spots open and two races to hash it out. Yes, guys who don't have a win will be pushing for a win, because it locks them in, but don't try and tell me if a few guys are good on points to get in they wont be protecting there "good points day" while running 8th. Points will be huge if this type of situation happens because that's what it will come down to.

I will also argue this, because drivers who win are almost a lock to get into the Chase they will gamble more, meaning they will leave points on the table when the gamble doesn't work out. This means other drivers will be looking to collect those points another driver with a win might have gained. Take Harvick for example, he is pretty much in, but has been leaving points out there during his bad luck run that other drivers are taking. These points that other drivers are getting when Harvick has a bad day will play a big role in the standings when NASCAR only has 13 winners (and it isn't just Harvick, it seems a lot of top tier drivers have had some bad luck early, leaving a lot of points out there for others to get). With Harvick another thing comes into play, he has to stay in the top 30 in the standings for that win to get him in (he will have no problem, but this could be an issue if someone steals a road course or super speedway win). Meaning, a driver with a win must also be in the top 30 in points standings after 26 races.

The final standings and last spots will still come down to points almost any way you look at it (16 winners or 13). I also believe, if a guy keeps running like Gordon has but never wins, he may still have a better shot then a guy like Harvick does when the Chase starts (that's saying it ended today). I say that because momentum and team chemistry will still play a huge role in the final 10 races (well maybe only 9, because the last race is a crap shoot). Just as in any other sport, a NFL team may start 8-0 (which is almost a virtual lock for the playoofs) but if they hobble into the playoffs at 10-6 chances are they wont get hot and make a run to the Super Bowl (crazier things have happened, but normally a situation like this they tank in the post season).

The team running well overall at the end of the season (yes, again that probably means having good points days most weeks, not just winning once and finishing 30th two weeks in a row) will have the best shot at winning it in the end, or at least making the final four drivers. So do I think winning is more important this season? Yes. But I do believe many people are overlooking the importance points will still have at the end of 26 races. When it comes down to 3 spots, and 5 drivers all mathematically have a shot, do you really think they will push so hard for that win while in 8th (and in on points at that moment) and wreck there car finishing 35th and missing the Chase? Everyone would say if he just held steady at 8th he would have been in, or a few more good points days would have made the difference. So, how can points not matter?

**Note: The last race technically comes down to points as well. Drivers don't get bonus points, but highest finisher wins. You don't have to win, but if you had a win or highest in points in each 3 race segment during the Chase and you make the final four, it all comes down to one race anyways. So again, points matter, but winning is way more important in 2014 than 2013**




Well, what do you think? Everyone has an opinion so let me know on Twitter @NASCARBTW. The funny thing is, Mr France said this change was to "simplify the points" when really it added another layer that confuses a lot of fans. I still like the new points system, but France, lets not lie to all of us more than you already do.

As always, thanks for reading and check out the rest of the blog.

Monday, January 20, 2014

NASCAR's Change in the Making

NASCAR Hints at Possible Points Change in Cup


By Richard Tix

Big news broke out this past weekend from the NASCAR camp and Mr. France. I waited all weekend to sit down and start this article. One, I wanted to gather all my thoughts, and two, I wanted to gauge the opinions on Twitter and see what the NASCAR Pulse was thinking. (If you missed the news, here is a link with the basics of the potential change)

As normal, change did not come to the delight of many. Change is never an easy thing especially when it comes to NASCAR. I however, don't mind change, but I am on the side that doesn't like change for the sake of change. So is that what this potential move is? Or is France onto something?

Now, I come from a huge background of Sports fans. I have been following NASCAR since I was a wee little kid, my older brother grooming me in, but I also have been a fan of football, basketball, baseball, hockey, heck I have even dabbled in Soccer (I know, don't judge!). Anyways, point is I have watched way too many sporting events from my own health's sake. What I took from this is the memories of amazing come backs, last second wins, crazy tournaments and playoffs, drama that was created because of the situation teams or players were in.

Under the current system drama and excitement can happen, sure, but the way elimination works right now you don't even notice it. After 3 chase races Carl Edwards can be down by 65 points, in which case he is practically "eliminated," but where is the win or go home mentality in that? If the current points change were to come around, he would be fighting with 3 other drivers to make the next round, to fight another day. Sure, if you start out poorly you probably wont have a chance at the final four spots, but should you? NASCAR still wants to award the driver who is the most consistent at the end of the day, so running well in Chase races 1-9 will put you in a good position to win a Championship.

Now, I understand people who say under new rules one part malfunction can put you out of the running, but really it can in the points system now too. When you think about it, the first 1-9 races are the same except more drivers can get in (16) and you can be eliminated. When NASCAR gets to the last two races we have already narrowed the drivers who have a chance down to about three anyways. Why not add some excitement, even if a driver doesn't have a shot at the Championship he will still want to make the next round.

Think about this past season at Richmond, minus all the sketchy play, and how exciting that finish was. It was unscripted (or so we think) and just plan fun. Now think of every Chase race and the potential. With the new potential system that is possible every Chase race (will it happen? Probably not, but the potential is there).

One other thing I like is the fact that a win can get you in. Drivers will push harder and harder as the season goes on to get a win (think Auto Club, minus the crash). The little teams have something to shoot for instead of just being out there as fillers. If a small team can get in they could potentially bring in a new sponsor. More sponsors in NASCAR is never a bad thing to me. Maybe that little team can move up in the ranks and become a middle of the road team? Anything is possible. Right now they can shoot for the glory of that one trip to Victory Lane, but that is where it ends. no Cinderella, no chance of the underdog making the next round in the playoffs.

Now for the final part of the potential rules change, the last race.  I have been up and down on this last race. The way they announced the possible change it sounds like points would be wiped out for the last four drivers in the final race. At one point I thought, that's just not fair, and maybe it wont always award the most consistent driver in one given season, but it isn't like it will go to some guy who was 20th in points but won a race to get in, it will go to one of the top four drivers all season. In the end, isn't that what a playoff is?

If your sport is going to have a Playoff, which NASCAR calls the Chase, why not have eliminations like any other Playoff around the world? I see this as an improvement overall for the Chase. If NASCAR is sticking to the Chase format why not make it a real playoff not just something posing as one? If NASCAR only wants to award the driver most consistent all season then do away with the Chase altogether.

Now, with any change there will be ups and downs in the new system. Like I said, I was once on the edge about the final race for everything, but go big or go home, right? I do however feel if NASCAR goes this points route, they need to look into changing the last race from year to year. Weather at this time of the year is a big issue, but there should be a few tracks they can rotate to at least give it a better look then Miami every year. The main reason I want this? Well because some drivers are great at Miami without trying, and others will just never be good there, so it puts way to big of strain on just that race. I mean, if you are going to wipe out points for the final four races you cant also put the pressure on these drivers that they have to be good at just that one track every year. Move a Las Vegas, Texas, or Phoenix into the last spot and rotate it with Miami. At least you get variety and drivers have to win the final win or go home race at a different track. Also, this may bring some extra fans back out to the tracks for those races. Being there when no one knows who is going to be the Champion is way more enticing then knowing the Champ after Chase race #8.

Maybe the final four drivers shouldn't be even points to start the last race? To award the driver who was most consistent during races 1-9 of the Chase maybe a few bonus points should be tiered off. Say 1st starts with 6 extra points, 2nd 4 extra, 3rd 2 extra, and last of the four starts at zero. This would still make it easy enough for a driver to win from second or third, but also an underdog could win from fourth, but the points are still close enough these guys have to push for the win.

As with any change, it comes with some harsh criticism. I am normally not on NASCAR's side when they change stuff because it always seems to happen too often. In this case I do like the general idea. Unfortunately NASCAR needs something and that's why they're in this situation, the target market isn't getting any younger. NASCAR is looking for a change to turn that around, and I think a real playoff could help. It brings interest back to a week to week basis and during the regular season an emphasis on winning. If this points change comes around it could be a new Era in NASCAR and maybe that keeps this sport going strong. This is what NASCAR might need for those last second shot style dramatic finishes that seemed to have been diminishing in racing over the past years.

Lets hear it Twitter! Everyone has there opinion and is entitled to them. What do you think? Do you like it? Are you not sure? Hate it? What's your reasons?

Need more?